Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof SUV vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
