Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2024 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Pilot Sport 4S were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S has B rating. We also know where Powerproof 2 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof 2
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Nokian Powerproof 2 Rating: Recommended | 132 | 63 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 6 | |
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Rating: Highly recommended | 141 | 68 | 53 | 20 | 15 | 5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||