In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2024 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Pilot Sport 4S were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S has B rating. We also know where Powerproof 2 is made - Finland.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2026 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.