• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has a better rating of 87% compared to 72% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof 2 is made - Finland.

# Nokian Powerproof 2
/72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
/87%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Kumho
DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32.825.2
Nokian Powerproof 234.428.1
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)34.427.1
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impactRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test141685523167
Nokian Powerproof 2
Rating: Recommended
13263472216 6
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Rating: Recommended
131624920155
Show test details