In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has a better rating of 78% compared to 64% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof 2 is made - Finland.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2026 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Nokian Powerproof 2
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.