Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 64% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof 2 is made in Finland and Azenis FK520 is made in Turkey.
| # | Nokian Powerproof 2
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 35.3 | 27.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Nokian Powerproof 2 Rating: Recommended | 132 | 63 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 6 | |
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | 135 | 62 | 52 | 21 | 15 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||