• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken Azenis FK520

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 64% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof 2 is made in Finland and Azenis FK520 is made in Turkey.

# Nokian Powerproof 2
/64%
Falken Azenis FK520
/74%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Falken
DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32.825.2
Nokian Powerproof 234.428.1
Falken Azenis FK52035.327.8
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impactRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test141685523167
Nokian Powerproof 2
Rating: Recommended
13263472216 6
Falken Azenis FK520
Rating: Highly recommended
135625221156
Show test details