Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken Azenis FK520
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 64% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Azenis FK520 were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof 2 is made in Finland and Azenis FK520 is made in Turkey.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2026 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Performance comparison
Nokian Powerproof 2
Falken Azenis FK520
Nokian Powerproof 2
Falken Azenis FK520
Nokian Powerproof 2
Falken Azenis FK520
Nokian Powerproof 2
Falken Azenis FK520
Nokian Powerproof 2
Falken Azenis FK520
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
