Segment
1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Continental SportContact 7 has a better rating of 100% compared to 64% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof 2 was done in 2026, compared to 2022 when was the Continental SportContact 7 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the SportContact 7 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Continental SportContact 7 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof 2 is made in Finland and SportContact 7 is made in Czech Republic/Slovakia/Portugal.
| # | Nokian Powerproof 2
| Continental SportContact 7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R18 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
1. Continental SportContact 7 Outstanding2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Nokian Powerproof 2 Rating: Recommended | 132 | 63 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 6 | |
| Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Highly recommended | 140 | 65 | 54 | 21 | 15 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||