Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 83% compared to 72% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Powerproof 2 and the Potenza Sport Evo were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof 2 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof 2
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Highly recommended2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport EVO | 34.5 | 28.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Nokian Powerproof 2 Rating: Recommended | 132 | 63 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 6 | |
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Rating: Highly recommended | 138 | 66 | 55 | 17 | 13 | 4 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
