Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, the rating is the same - 0%. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and Ultrac Vorti is made in Netherlands.
| # | Nokian Line
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
