Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Nokian Powerproof 2
Table of contents:
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2026 when was the Nokian Powerproof 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof 2 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and Powerproof 2 is made in Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Nokian Powerproof 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
