Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (56%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
