Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Continental EcoContact 6
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (62%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line has A wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and EcoContact 6 is made in Germany.
| # | Nokian Line
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian Line 74%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian Line 78%
Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Fuel efficiency
2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Interior noise
2. Nokian Line 66%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
