Segment
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (57%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Line SUV and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Line SUV
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
1. Nokian Line SUV Good
1. Nokian Line SUV Good
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | |||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak | 95,6 | 93,6 | 97,5 | 97,2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||