• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (57%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Line SUV and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian Line SUV
/0%
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Yokohama
DimensionsR15 - R19 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

1

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistance
Best values in test100100100109
Nokian Line SUV
Rating: Good
96,897,296,486,5
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Rating: Weak
95,693,697,597,2
Show test details