Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 127 | 42 | 44 | 17 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
