Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Line SUV and the Proxes CF2 SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2017 | 215/60 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Nokian Line SUV
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian Line SUV
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian Line SUV
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian Line SUV
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian Line SUV
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian Line SUV
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
