Segment
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Nexen N blue HD Plus, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Line SUV and the N blue HD Plus were tested.
| # | Nokian Line SUV
| Nexen N blue HD Plus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak | 95,4 | 93,7 | 97 | 92,1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
