Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Michelin Latitude Tour HP
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Michelin Latitude Tour HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Latitude Tour HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Line SUV and the Latitude Tour HP were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 2 tests
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nokian Line SUV
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
