Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Line SUV and the Dynapro HP2 RA33 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 has B rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2017 | 215/65 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
