Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium3. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle4. Semperit Van-Life 2 Lowcost5. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian cLine VAN vs. Pirelli CARRIER vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo vs. Semperit Van-Life 2 vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory3. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory3. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Semperit Van-Life 2 Rating: Poor | 5,1 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 1,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
