Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle4. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian cLine VAN vs. Kumho PorTran KC53 vs. Pirelli CARRIER vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| # | Nokian cLine VAN
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Pirelli CARRIER
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R12 - R17 | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
