Segment
1. Nexen WinGuard Sport Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Nexen (34%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen WinGuard Sport and Sava Eskimo S3+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WinGuard Sport and the Eskimo S3+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nexen WinGuard Sport
| Sava Eskimo S3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nexen WinGuard Sport Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport | 45,6 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100,6 | ||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport | 91 | 98 | 91,9 | ||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 94,4 | 96,4 | 100,6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||