Segment
1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Lowcost2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV vs. Apollo Aspire XP Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Nexen (47%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 215/60 R17 test, where both the WinGuard Sport 2 SUV and the Aspire XP Winter were tested.
| # | Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Rating: Not recommended | 3 | 3+ | 1- | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
