Segment
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (34%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 and Tristar Snowpower HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Tristar Snowpower HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Winguard Snow G WH2 and the Snowpower HP were tested.
| # | Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
| Tristar Snowpower HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R13 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Recommended
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 | 36,8 | 29,4 | |||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 42 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||