Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle4. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 10.29
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
4. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
