Segment
1. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N fera Sport vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Nexen N fera Sport
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today we are comparing two summer tyres - the Nexen N fera Sport and the Sava Intensa UHP 2. These two models have shown formidable performance in various tests carried out by esteemed bodies such as Autobild and ADAC.
Starting with the Nexen N fera Sport, a product of Nexen, this tyre comes with commendable ratings, standing at 59%. This tyre, used as original equipment on the BMW 2-series Active Tourer, is made in the Czech Republic and is of the Ultra High-Performance subtype. This tyre has secured the 7th and 5th positions in tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC respectively, with special highlights being its 'Aquaplaning - longitudal', 'Wet braking' and 'mileage' features. It has exhibited superior performance on dry roads but has slight weaknesses on wet surfaces and a slightly increased wear and tear rate. Furthermore, the Nexen N fera Sport results in a slightly higher fuel consumption than some other competitors.
Moving on to its counterpart in this comparison, the Sava Intensa UHP 2. Designed by Sava, this upgraded model from the earlier Sava Intensa UHP has an improved rating of 67%. This tyre stands at 28th position in the Autobild test and 6th position in the ADAC test, with its noise control, 'Aquaplaning - cross', 'Fuel efficiency', and 'mileage' as its best features. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 comes with noteworthy attributes such as short dry braking distances, lower rolling resistance, and a competitive cost. However, it does show a tendency to understeer during wet and dry handling and has a moderate aquaplaning reserve.
To sum it up, both the Nexen N fera Sport and Sava Intensa UHP 2 are reliable summer tyres with unfortunately some limitations on wet surfaces. The Nexen N fera Sport shines with its performance on dry roads and mileage, whereas the Sava Intensa UHP 2 scores points with its low noise, fuel efficiency, and value for money. In terms of their overall performance in mutual tests, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 slightly outperforms the Nexen N fera Sport. A buyer's choice of tyre should consider these details along with their specific driving requirements, conditions, and style.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,8 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
