Segment
1. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N fera Sport vs. Linglong Sport Master
Table of contents:
| # | Nexen N fera Sport
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing the Nexen N fera Sport and the Linglong Sport Master, the overall rating reveals a slight lead for the Linglong model with a 64% rating, compared to the 59% of the Nexen tyre.
The Nexen N fera Sport, produced in the Czech Republic, is a UHP (Ultra High Performance) summer tyre. It's been the first choice for initial equipment on the BMW 2-series Active Tourer. Its strengths lie in short dry braking distances and low rolling noise, while a moderate price also adds to its appeal. The drawbacks, however, are seen in the below-average mileage performance and understeering handling behaviour. In the Autobild test, out of 50 tyres, the Nexen N fera Sport was placed 14th, showcasing a decent quality-to-price ratio. More about Nexen.
On the other hand, the Linglong Sport Master, despite not revealing its country of origin, shows a stronger performance. This UHP summer tyre excels in low exterior noise and good grip both in wet and dry conditions. However, it does have a couple of limiting factors including very low mileage, understeering handling in dry conditions, and relatively reduced comfort. Still, in the Autobild test, it managed the 7th position out of 50 tyres, marking it distinctly among the strong performers in the tyre market. More about Linglong.
In the mutual tests, the Linglong Sport Master consistently outperformed the Nexen N fera Sport, providing shorter braking distances under various weather conditions. Both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, with Linglong's noticeably better test positions ensuring it wins this head-to-head. However, it is worth noting that individual preferences and driving circumstances might alter the perfect fit of either tyre. Purchase decisions must take into consideration specific vehicle requirements, personal driving style, and preferences over cost, noise, and wear.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
