Segment
1. Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV Lowcost2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV vs. Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Maxxis (63%). The first tyre test of Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the N FERA SPORT SUV and the Victra Sport 5 were tested.
| # | Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nexen N fera Sport SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
