Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nexen (67%). The first tyre test of Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the N FERA SPORT SUV and the Azenis FK510 SUV were tested.
| # | Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Gravel traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nexen N fera Sport SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
