Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nexen (67%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 94% compared to 66% of the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2. The first tyre test of Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the N Fera Sport SU2 and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested.
| # | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
