Segment
1. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Lowcost2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N Fera RU 1 vs. CST Medallion MD-A1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than CST (51%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen N Fera RU 1 and CST Medallion MD-A1, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the N Fera RU 1 and the Medallion MD-A1 were tested.
| # | Nexen N Fera RU 1
| CST Medallion MD-A1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Good
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nexen N Fera RU 1 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
