Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N Fera RU 1 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nexen (66%). The first tyre test of Nexen N Fera RU 1 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the N Fera RU 1 and the Turanza T005 were tested.
| # | Nexen N Fera RU 1
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R23 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Good
Offroad
(Overall rating)Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nexen N Fera RU 1 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
