Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost5. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Maxxis Mecotra 3 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus | 35,8 | 32,1 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
