Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost5. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost6. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Maxxis Mecotra 3 vs. Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
5. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
3. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
4. Gt Radial Fe2 16.55. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
4. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
5. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet braking
4. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
3. Gt Radial Fe2 71%
Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Gt Radial Fe2 65%
Mileage
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
5. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus | 35,8 | 32,1 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
