Segment
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Nokian Line SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen N blue HD Plus and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the N blue HD Plus and the Line SUV were tested.
| # | Nexen N blue HD Plus
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak | 95,4 | 93,7 | 97 | 92,1 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
