Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nexen (66%). The first tyre test of Nexen N blue HD Plus was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the N blue HD Plus and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nexen N blue HD Plus
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus | 35,8 | 32,1 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 36,5 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||