Segment
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N Blue 4 Season vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
| # | Nexen N Blue 4 Season
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R21 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today's tyre comparison focuses on the Nexen N Blue 4 Season, a model that has now been replaced by the Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2, and the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.
Beginning with the Nexen N Blue 4 Season, with our rating of 33%, it has demonstrated convincing winter qualities and exemplary mileage, especially noteworthy for its economical pricing. However, it demonstrates understeer on wet and dry tracks, extended wet braking distances, and increased rolling resistance. In the Autoklub ČR and Autobild tests, the Nexen N Blue 4 Season ranked 9th and 12th respectively, outperforming in areas such as mileage and price-value ratio. However, its performance levels generally lagged behind the later model, Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2.
Moving onto the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, earning a higher rating at 61%, it outperformed the Nexen tyre in the same tests. Boasting short wet braking distances and low rolling resistance, it has comfort and dry handling among its key strengths. However, it only delivers satisfactory qualities for driving on snow and ice, delayed steering response, understeer on snow, and average mileage. Despite the challenges, it secured the 2nd position in the Autoklub ČR test and the 8th place in the Autobild test.
Comparing the two, Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO emerges as the more reliable all-round tyre. It balances performance on wet and dry surfaces, comfort and handling. Yet, it falls back in winter conditions compared to Nexen N Blue 4 Season. Therefore, for drivers prioritising winter performance and price-value, Nexen can be a preferable choice. Meanwhile, those who seek overall performance and handling and not concerned with winter driving, would find the Bridgestone model more fitting.
For more details about these tyres, visit Nexen's manufacturer site and Bridgestone's manufacturer site.
Verdict: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO wins for its overall performance and handling, while Nexen N Blue 4 Season is a sensible choice for solid winter performance and great price-value.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N Blue 4 Season Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 102.7 | 104,8 | 104,5 | 102,7 | |||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season | 97,97 | 101,6 | 98,7 | 93,6 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 101,8 | 104,8 | 102,5 | 99,2 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 102.7 | 102,5 | 104,5 | 102,1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season | 43,7 | 54,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 39,9 | 49,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 2 | 3 | 2- | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | ||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season | 42 | 54 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 52,9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37,6 | 53,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
