Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nankang (9%). But when it comes to comparing Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 and Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-55 and the Wintrac Xtreme S were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nankang Winter Activa SV-55
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Lowcost
1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Satisfactory2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Sufficient
1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Conditionally recommended2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 9,3 | 9,1 | ||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Rating: - | 7,1 | 6,5 | 8,0 | 6,0 | 7,2 | ||
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Rating: - | 8,3 | 7,8 | 9,0 | 8,4 | 7,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | ||||||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 | 7,1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S | 8,3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||