14 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Nankang Winter Activa Sv 3
Bridgestone Blizzak Lm 005

Comparison: Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nankang (9%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 10% of the Nankang Winter Activa SV-3. The first tyre test of Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 /10%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 18

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 3x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 12.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 35.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 27

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 2023

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 ?

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90.2%

Nankang
Winter Activa SV-3

50.5%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82.4%

Nankang
Winter Activa SV-3

79.8%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nankang
Winter Activa SV-3

78.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77.8%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.6%

Nankang
Winter Activa SV-3

60.8%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nankang
Winter Activa SV-3

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3	38,4	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,8
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3	38
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details