Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nankang (9%). But when it comes to comparing Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-2 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested.
| # | Nankang Winter Activa SV-2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Rating: Not recommended | 3 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||