Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
Comparison: Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ | 37,6 | 35,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ | 7,1 | 7,5 | 7,2 | 4,4 | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 6,9 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 5,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
