18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ /0%	Vredestein Ultrac Vorti /0%	Avon ZV7 /12%	Vredestein Quatrac Pro /52%	GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R17 - R24	R13 - R21	R17 - R22	R17 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Premium

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost

5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Avon ZV7 278

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 173

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 102

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 82

5. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 74

Number of tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 15x

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 13x

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 12x

4. Avon ZV7 11x

5. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 5x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 1.

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2.

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 3.

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 7.

5. Avon ZV7 8.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 6.

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 9.

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 12.

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 39.

5. Avon ZV7 42.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2.33

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 5.17

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 6.62

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 17.6

5. Avon ZV7 18.55

Year of the last test

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2025

2. Avon ZV7 2023

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2022

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 2021

5. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 2020

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary

4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory

5. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient

Worst rating in test

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Good

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Good

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended

4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient

5. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

89.7%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

83%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

82.5%

Avon
ZV7

75.6%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 A

2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ ?

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

4. Avon ZV7 ?

5. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

88.4%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

83%

Avon
ZV7

78.8%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

75.3%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

73%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

100%

Avon
ZV7

82.3%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

80%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

80.1%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

75.7%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 70 dB

2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ ?

3. Avon ZV7 ?

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

5. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

76.6%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

64.6%

Avon
ZV7

58.7%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

40%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

20%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 C

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

3. Avon ZV7 ?

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

5. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,2	28,7
Nankang Sportnex AS-2+	37,6	35,9
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti	35,3	30,8
Avon ZV7	35,3	35,1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	34,7	28,8
Show test details