Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Upper-middle3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
4. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Satisfactory4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Conditionally recommended3. Avon ZV7 Sufficient4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ | 37,6 | 35,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 35,3 | 35,1 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes T1 Sport | 37,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ | 7,1 | 7,5 | 7,2 | 4,4 | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 6,9 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 5,5 | |||
| Toyo Proxes T1 Sport | 7,1 | 7,6 | 7,0 | 5,8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
