Segment
1. Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 Lowcost2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Laufenn allround tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Nankang (32%). In this particular case, the Laufenn G Fit 4S has a better rating of 64% compared to 32% of the Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6. The first tyre test of Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn G Fit 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the CROSS SEASONS AW-6 and the G Fit 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6
| Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 Lowcost2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good2. Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 Satisfactory
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good2. Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Nankang Cross Seasons AW-6 | 43.5 | 56.7 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.1 | 45.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 | 46,9 | 57,6 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||