Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Mirage MR-182 vs. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Mirage) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Mirage (0%). But when it comes to comparing Mirage MR-182 and Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 , the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the MR-182 and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested.
| # | Mirage MR-182
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Mirage MR-182 24.
Worst position in test
1. Mirage MR-182 24.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Mirage MR-182 | 37,7 | 31,8 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
