Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Minerva Ice-Plus S210 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Minerva (0%). But when it comes to comparing Minerva Ice-Plus S210 and Falken EuroWinter HS01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Minerva Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 245/40 R19 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested.
| # | Minerva Ice-Plus S210
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 35.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 2 | 4- | ||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
