Segment
1. Minerva Frostrack HP Lowcost2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost
Comparison: Minerva Frostrack HP vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (47%) than Minerva (0%). But when it comes to comparing Minerva Frostrack HP and Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Minerva Frostrack HP was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Frostrack HP and the Winguard Snow G WH2 were tested.
| # | Minerva Frostrack HP
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R13 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Minerva Frostrack HP | 41,7 | - | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 | 36,8 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
