Segment
2. Minerva Frostrack HP Lowcost
Comparison: Minerva Frostrack HP vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Minerva (0%). The first tyre test of Minerva Frostrack HP was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frostrack HP and the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 were tested.
| # | Minerva Frostrack HP
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Minerva Frostrack HP | 44.5 | - | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 37.8 | 29.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
