Segment
1. Minerva Frostrack HP Lowcost2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: Minerva Frostrack HP vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Minerva (0%). The first tyre test of Minerva Frostrack HP was done in 2018, compared to 2024 when was the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frostrack HP and the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo were tested.
| # | Minerva Frostrack HP
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Minerva Frostrack HP | 44.5 | - | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
