Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Milever Winter-maX A1 MW255 vs. Debica Frigo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Milever) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Milever (0%). The first tyre test of Milever Winter-maX A1 MW255 was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Winter-maX A1 MW255 and the Frigo HP2 were tested.
| # | Milever Winter-maX A1 MW255
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Milever Winter-maX A1 MW255 | 42.8 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
